NAAC

Criterion 2

 

2.1.1 Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
  • 2.1.1.1. Number of students admitted year wise during last five years
  • 2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
* Supporting Document
2.1.2 Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years. (Exclusive of supernumerary seats).
  • 2.1.2.1. Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years
* Supporting Document
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners . * Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.2.2 Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) * Supporting Document
2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences * Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.3.2 Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. * Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.3.3 Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )
  • 2.3.3.1 Number of mentors
  • Number of students assigned to each Mentor
  • Formula: Mentor : Mentee
* Supporting Document
2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years * Supporting Document
2.4.2 Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
  • 2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years
* Supporting Document
2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years)
  • 2.4.3.1: Total experience of full-time teachers
* Supporting Document
2.5.1 Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode * Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.5.2 Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient * Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.6.1 Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students. * Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.6.2 Result of attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution
* Write-Up
* Supporting Document
2.6.3 Average pass percentage of Students during last five years * Supporting Document
2.7.1 Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. * Supporting Document